Showing posts with label UCLA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UCLA. Show all posts

Monday, October 26, 2009

This Blog's Good For Your Brain

October 26, 2009, 6:00 a.m.
For UI and Iowa's budget, see links from "TARP Lessons for Iowa's Budget Cutters," October 23, 2009.

Searching the Internet to Find It Even More So
(brought to you by FromDC2Iowa.blogspot.com*)

Remember "this is your brain on drugs"?



Well, this is your brain on the Internet:









And this is your brain while reading:

[Photo credit: "Internet Use 'Good for the Brain'; For middle-aged and older people at least, using the internet helps boost brain power, research suggests," BBC News, October 14, 2009; "Internet Brain [interview with Dr. Gary Small]," "Science in Action"/BBC World Service, October 23, 2009 (with link to streaming audio).]

So that's why I modify the heading on this blog entry ("Reading This Blog") with the sub-head ("Searching the Internet"). Most of those reading this blog have come to it directly. But the next largest group have come as a result of a Google (or other) search. And it is this searching and surfing that UCLA's Gary Small, Susan Y. Bookheimer and Teena D. Moody say is expanding the mental capacity of especially older Internet users. Rachel Champeau, "First-time Internet users find boost in brain function after just one week," UCLA Newsroom, October 19, 2009.

I would guess, however, that even those of you who are coming to the blog directly are relatively heavy Internet users -- one of the groups including in the UCLA research: "The UCLA team worked with 24 neurologically normal volunteers between the ages of 55 and 78. Prior to the study, half the participants used the Internet daily, while the other half had very little experience. Age, educational level and gender were similar between the two groups."

Not incidentally, the results from their functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans indicate there is much greater brain activity (at least activity in more areas of the brain) from Internet searching than from reading -- as indicated in the photos at the top of this blog entry. Admittedly, the participants were between 55 and 78. But there's no intuitive reason to believe that the results would not be similar among young children -- the next group the researchers plan to study.

So those parents and teachers wishing students would read more may want to apply the old adage, attributed to numerous sources, that you should be careful what you wish for because you may get it. Perhaps their concern should be addressed to to those students who are spending excessive time with books and too little time with the Internet.

Of course, I'm only half serious. (1) At a minimum students need to be able to do both; and if I had to choose I'd pick reading skills over searching skills -- though I'd prefer not to have to make that choice. (2) Once the Internet search is over, and you find the relevant document, literacy is still a useful skill. (3) Not all interaction with computers involves Internet searching. At least this research did not address the neural consequences of consuming streaming audio or video, playing video games, text messaging, conversing over Skype, or looking at photos. (4) Internet searching can be a form of procrastination that has the opportunity cost for students of falling behind in homework or other obligations. (5) Worst case, there is such a thing as Internet addiction that really needs to be tended to.

Subject to those caveats, however, Dr. Small and his associates do seem to have come up with something we need to add to nutrition, exercise, sleep and stress reduction as elements of healthy living: Internet searching.
_______________

Gary Small, M.D. is the Director of the UCLA Memory & Aging Research Center at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior and the author of iBrain: Surviving the Technological Alteration of the Modern Mind (2008) (Amazon offers the usual table of contents, excerpt, and index here); but see the Kirkus review on the Google Books site). The Gary Small and iBrain Web site has a link to streaming video of a CBS interview.

Here are more excerpts from the UCLA news release, Rachel Champeau, "First-time Internet users find boost in brain function after just one week," UCLA Newsroom, October 19, 2009:

You can teach an old dog new tricks, say UCLA scientists who found that middle-aged and older adults with little Internet experience were able to trigger key centers in the brain that control decision-making and complex reasoning after just one week of surfing the Web.

The findings, presented Oct. 19 at the 2009 meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, suggest that Internet training can stimulate neural activation patterns and could potentially enhance brain function and cognition in older adults.

As the brain ages, a number of structural and functional changes occur, including atrophy, reductions in cell activity and increases in deposits of amyloid plaques and tau tangles, which can impact cognitive function.

Research has shown that mental stimulation similar to that which occurs in individuals who frequently use the Internet may affect the efficiency of cognitive processing and alter the way the brain encodes new information.

"We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function," said study author Dr. Gary Small, a professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA and the author of "iBrain," a book that describes the impact of new technology on the brain and behavior. . . .

The first scan of participants with little Internet experience demonstrated brain activity in regions controlling language, reading, memory and visual abilities, which are located in the frontal, temporal, parietal, visual and posterior cingulate regions, researchers said. The second brain scan of these participants, conducted after the practice Internet searches at home, demonstrated activation of these same regions, as well as triggering of the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus — areas of the brain known to be important in working memory and decision-making.

Thus, after Internet training at home, participants with minimal online experience displayed brain activation patterns very similar to those seen in the group of savvy Internet users — after just a brief period of time.

"The results suggest that searching online may be a simple form of brain exercise that might be employed to enhance cognition in older adults," said Teena D. Moody, the study's first author and a senior research associate at the Semel Institute at UCLA.

When performing an Internet search, the ability to hold important information in working memory and to extract the important points from competing graphics and words is essential, [Teena D.] Moody noted. . . .
_______________
* Why do I put this blog ID at the top of the entry, when you know full well what blog you're reading? Because there are a number of Internet sites that, for whatever reason, simply take the blog entries of others and reproduce them as their own without crediting the source. I don't mind the flattering attention, but would appreciate acknowledgment as the source, even if I have to embed it myself. -- Nicholas Johnson
# # #

Monday, February 04, 2008

Obama: Inspiring AND Polls Say Strongest Candidate

February 4, 2008, 12:40 p.m.

I'm Voting for Michelle

There was a really extraordinary event in Los Angeles yesterday that I just happened to catch by accident as I was scanning the channels.

Although Barack Obama was not there, the event was billed by C-SPAN as "Obama for President Rally at UCLA (February 3, 2008)." Today it is available from the C-SPAN.org site under "Recent Programs." If when you check that site it is no longer listed there, through the miracle of C-SPAN and its Archival collection you can watch it on small screen RealPlayer at your leisure.

It was remarkable by many measures -- the size of the crowd, the presence (and Obama endorsements) from Caroline Kennedy, Oprah, Stevie Wonder, and Maria Shriver.

I wasn't able to watch all of the event that runs over an hour (1:23:45). What I did see, and that I found one of the most impressive and moving campaign speeches about a candidate I've ever heard, were the remarks of Barack Obama's wife, Michelle.

If you'd like to watch her presentation, you can slide the control in RealPlayer to 23:50, where she begins and listen through to 57:07 where she introduces the surprise "added starter," Maria Shriver (who is, of course, the wife of California's Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has endorsed Senator John McCain).

Listening to Michelle Obama's speech provides even more insight into why the polls this morning are revealing what they do.

My support of Obama is not based on polls, or who stands the best chance of winning in November. It's not often that my political choices end up as winners -- which is not surprising since they have never been selected for that reason.

But in this case -- at least at this time, and I'm fully aware, to paraphrase the song, "Oh, it's a long, long time from February to November" -- for the benefit of those who do put much more emphasis on ability to win than I do, it appears that Obama also happens to have a great many advantages over Senator Hillary Clinton from that perspective as well.

NPR reported this morning ["Morning Edition," Feb. 4] and makes available from its Web site a poll it commissioned from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, conducted January 29-31, 2008, published February 4, 2008, of 1000 likely voters.

It includes such things as the trends on approval ratings for the president and Congress, issues thought most important by voters, and so forth. But here's what it reveals about Obama and Clinton.

Given a choice between Clinton and McCain, Clinton loses: 48% to 45%. Among Democrats, 9% prefer McCain over Clinton (only 5% of Republicans prefer Clinton over McCain). Among independents McCain has a 26 point spread: 58% go with McCain, and 32% with Clinton.

When the choice is between Obama and McCain, this poll shows the result to be a statistical dead heat: 48% McCain, 47% Obama (although other polls, which also show Clinton losing to McCain, show Obama with a slight edge over McCain -- or in the case of yesterday's Zogby poll, below, a rapid rise in support for Obama over Clinton).

Obama pulls 48% of the independents (compared to Clinton's 32%), a tie with McCain, who also gets 48%. Among Republicans 13% say they'll vote for Obama (compared with Clinton's 5%); although 18% of Democrats would vote for McCain if the choice is Obama (compared with Clinton's more favorable loss of 9%).

If Romney were the Republicans' nominee, Clinton would win by 5 points (49-44%) but Obama would win by over twice that (53-41%).

When all voters are asked how their opinions have changed during the primary contests, 59% are "somewhat" or "much" less willing to support Clinton than they were before (to 38% "somewhat" or "much" more willing to support her) -- a drop of 21 percentage points. For Obama, it is 52% more willing> and 42% less willing -- a 10 point gain compared to Clinton's 21 point loss.

(For the Republicans, McCain gains 6 points, Romney (like Clinton) has a 22 point loss.)

The daily tracking poll run by Zogby for C-SPAN and Reuters, is even more favorable for Obama this morning [Feb. 4]:

Pollster John Zogby: "A very big single day for Obama in California (49%-32% over Clinton) and Missouri (49%-39% single day). In California, Obama has widened his lead in the north and pulled ahead in the south. He leads among Democrats and Independents, liberals and moderates, men (by 21 points),among whites, and African Americans. He holds big leads among voters who say Iraq and immigration are their top concerns. Clinton holds a big lead among Hispanics (though Obama has made some inroads), women, voters over 65, and has pulled ahead among those citing the economy. "In Missouri, Obama leads two to one in the St. Louis region, and has solid leads with independents, voters under 50, and African Americans. He also leads among Missouri women."
It looks like we finally have a race where one can vote with their head and their heart and still have a real shot at having gone with a winner.

In politics, it just doesn't get any better than that.

# # #