Friday, March 20, 2026

"SAVING AMERICA" BY ABOLISHING DEMOCRACY??!!

"SAVING AMERICA" BY ABOLISHING DEMOCRACY??!!

Posted to Nicholas Johnson's Facebook Page, and copied here, March 20, 2026

Here's why the final, death blow destroying our Democracy is the misnamed "Save America Act."

There are seemingly hundreds of ways in which our democracy has been, and continues to be, under assault. But there is a future, if remote, possibility that each could be dealt with in turn over the next decade or two.

Not so with the "Destroy America Act."

It is just one example of what is called "voter suppression" -- rules with the purpose of preventing voting by millions of Americans.

How can that be?

"Voter suppression" schemes, as the name suggests, prevent large numbers of voters from voting at all. For example, the voter suppression scheme being proposed requires that, in order to vote, one must possess and show one of two documents: a passport, or a birth certificate -- something that I believe I read would be impossible for roughly half of all potential voters to do. (Could you?)

Don't be fooled. This is not "voter identification." Voter identification is satisfied with a driver's license, a military or university ID card, a recent envelope with your address from a utility -- anything of that nature you have handy.

There's a possibility America's 250-year-old Democracy will die with either a bang or a whimper. But know that it can be killed this year with "voter suppression."

# # #

Saturday, March 14, 2026

Welcome to FromDC2Iowa: Contents & Guide

Over 1,500 blog posts on a variety of topics since 2006.

What to do?

1. Old friend of the blog and repeat visitor? You already know what you want to do and how to do it.

2. First time visitor? Here are some choices:

(a) "I'm just looking." Look to right-hand column listing years. Clicking on the little triangle in front of a year will display the months of that year. Clicking on the little triangle in front of any of the displayed months will display the titles on blogs posted that month. Clicking on a blog post's title will take you to the text of that blog post.

(b) Researching a Topic? Scroll down the right-hand column to "Search;" enter key words to search on, select "FromDC2Iowa blog" or "Nicholas Johnson Web Site" and follow directions. Want ideas? Visit "Key Word Searches."

(c) Searching by Date? Scroll down right-hand column to "Blog Archive." As explained in (a), above, click on triangle in front of year to display months, month to display posts.

3. Who is this blog's author? Nicholas Johnson.

_________________________

Checklist for War

Wars Have Checklists. The U.S. Should Use Them
Nicholas Johnson
The Gazette, March 11, 2026, p. A6

If you mow your lawn with a push mower your checklist is short: (1) find mower, (2) push it through the grass.

If you’re planning a vacation, wedding, or Thanksgiving dinner, the checklist becomes longer. AI Gemini created for me an overwhelming, six-phase, multi-dates, times and dishes checklist for that meal.

What’s this got to do with our war with Iran? Simply that wars also have checklists, and it’s not clear whether we’re using them.

For starters, you can’t just have a war anywhere.

As Maritime Administrator in the mid ‘60s, I needed to travel to Vietnam. The White House asked that, while there I gather and share my thoughts about the war. My conclusion: “You can’t play basketball on a football field.”

That is, there are circumstances when war’s not an easy option (e.g., you can’t speak the language; don’t know the culture, history or territory; you wear uniforms, the enemy doesn’t; there’s no front line).

My analysis had no impact – except for the White House decision I’d do better as FCC commissioner than Maritime Administrator. Oh, and the Iowa women’s team showed it could play basketball on the Kinnick Stadium football field.

This month, as I’ve watched our military efforts spread from Iran to varieties of chaos for 15-middle-eastern-countries and beyond, it brought to mind a 34-year-old checklist proposed by Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger and his senior military assistant, General Colin Powell (referred to as the Weinberger, or Powell, “Doctrine”). It was a list of the considerations and questions they felt should be resolved before a war.

Was this working checklist known to, or used by, those civilians who are dictating to the military a variety of strategies and reasons for our latest war? Or did the White House assume there was no more need for checklists and planning than when pushing a mower through the grass?

For starters, my summaries of the Powell Doctrine do not assume war; they begin by asking:

Clear Objective: Do we have a precisely defined, attainable goal?
Goal: Is it sufficiently important, clearly defined, and understood?
Vital Interests: Is a key national security interest at stake?
Alternatives: Have all non-violent means been tried and failed?
Military: Will military air operations contribute, or impede, our goal?
Requirements: What will our goal require in troops, materiel, and lives?
Success: What will constitute “success”?
Risks & Costs: Is “success” worth the possible impacts, risks and costs?
Knowledge: Do we know the language, history, and terrain of the people?
Support: Will Americans, Congress and allies support a war? How long?
Exit: How can we leave without Vietnam or Afghanistan-like scenes?
Future: After we’ve left will the people be better or worse off, or the same?
Consistency: Will that be consistent with our original mission?

In the 1983 movie War Games, a computer counting down to a real “Global Thermonuclear War” is switched to tic-tac-toe. We might just conclude, as the computer did, that “The only winning move is not to play.”

Nicholas Johnson can be reached at mailbox@nicholasjohnson.org


Sources

“Around nine-in-ten Americans (91%) celebrate Thanksgiving.” John Gramlich, Chip Rotolo and Laura Silver, “The vast majority of Americans celebrate Thanksgiving, but their traditions and activities vary widely,” Pew Research Center, Nov. 21, 2024, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/11/21/the-vast-majority-of-americans-celebrate-thanksgiving-but-their-traditions-and-activities-vary-widely/

Nicholas Johnson, GENERAL SEMANTICS, TERRORISM AND WAR ETC: A Review of General Semantics Vol. 64, No. 1 (January 2007), pp. 45-64 (20 pages) https://www.jstor.org/stable/42578697

Wikipedia, Powell Doctrine The "Powell Doctrine" is a term named after General Colin Powell, for a military doctrine that Powell created in the run-up to the 1990–1991 Gulf War. The doctrine poses questions emphasizing national security interests, overwhelming strike capabilities with an emphasis on ground forces, and widespread public support,[1] all of which have to be answered affirmatively before military action is taken. Powell's doctrine is based in large part on the Weinberger Doctrine, devised by Caspar Weinberger during his tenure as Secretary of Defense (at which time Powell was Weinberger's senior military assistant). The Powell Doctrine states that a list of questions all have to be answered affirmatively before military action is taken by the United States:[2][3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_Doctrine#:~:text=5.1%20Primary%20sources-,Summary,been%20fully%20and%20frankly%20analyzed%3F

Caspar Weinberger, “The Uses of Military Power," National Press Club, Washington, D.C., Nov. 28, 1984, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weinberger_Doctrine ; also The Historian of the U.S. Department of State, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1981-88v01/d219

“Maj. Gen. Colin Powell was [Secretary of Defense] Caspar Weinberger’s recently appointed military assistant when I met him in the fall of 1983.” Dov S. Zakheim,” Colin Powell believed in leadership — and he was a smart, popular leader,” The Hill, Oct. 29, 2021, https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/577333-colin-powell-believed-in-leadership-and-he-was-a-smart-popular/

Best source for the text of "The Powell Doctrine," https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&udm=50&aep=42&source=chrome.crn.rb&q=Best+source+for+the+text+of+%22The+Powell+Doctrine%22&mstk=AUtExfDMvkn9zMGRd0WCultfqnCLjL3MYLg_5Z2mfRnsc68FXmWS0FYHv5FGKEJV5sTcoUi8CC5_-DS2gf8Zk3MLv7AJJSn_LtioLUjX6E1Xxe1XO0QmOcP520d6GebaamsAfMoTDToWEHK3pTnsOEfmPoM5WF3Ya4UJXsxggq4RgCGGt2fPcMWYchZbgHfNAt6K6IOHnpTuy5f08nTAJK9QZKU3E0fUlRKmSPS_VTpTMBpG6gxsoKnNElFPr2ftxIjasQG0PSRz2RPqEMD855Mh_zpSQVYWcsZ2F0w4PqcydYVnhtE4eG6jWTs_SeLTuRY27jSZRMn-HWkY0Q&csuir=1&mtid=mlSsaZ_vKMDtptQPm5XemQo

The "Powell Doctrine" is not a single, signed legislative document but rather a set of principles derived from General Colin Powell's writings and military strategy. The most authoritative "text" for the doctrine is found in his 1992 article "U.S. Forces: Challenges Ahead" published in Foreign Affairs.

Primary Sources

"U.S. Forces: Challenges Ahead" (Foreign Affairs, Winter 1992): This is the definitive essay where Powell articulated the "relevant questions" that must be answered before committing force.

The National Military Strategy (1992): As Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Powell authored this official Department of Defense document that codified the "Base Force" concept and the strategic shift to post-Cold War regional contingencies.

"The Uses of Military Power" (1984): While technically the Weinberger Doctrine, this speech by then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger is the direct precursor to Powell's ideas. Powell served as Weinberger's senior military assistant when these six tests were developed. [Access to Foreign Affairs requires a subscription.]

NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY OF THE UNITED STATES https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nms/nms1992.pdf

# # #

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

We Have Work to Do

We Have Work to Do
Nicholas Johnson
The Gazette, February 7, 2026, p. A6

Unless you are listed on one of the tribal rolls of our 574 Indian Tribes, you are either an immigrant or the beneficiary of an immigrating ancestor. In short, when we talk about “immigrants” we are talking about ourselves.

One list of “Famous U.S. Immigrants” lists about 100 (including the president’s wife) whose names and “American accomplishments” you’ll recognize.

The less famous are equally essential to our economy. Last year the total number called “immigrants” was 53.3 million foreignborn residents. Jobs with the highest percentage of “immigrants” include agriculture, construction, cleaning and maintenance, food preparation and personal care (80 percent of all manicurists and pedicurists).

For me, diversity makes a more interesting city: 60 languages in Iowa City schools, the variety of birthplaces of Uber drivers, those I encounter during neighborhood walks, and the range of our restaurants’ cuisine. All for much less than the $5,000 or more it would cost for a round trip to even one of their countries.

Of course, speaking of painted fingernails, some Americans have preferences of skin color and foreign accents that suppresses their interest in “immigrants.”

Given that we are all immigrants, and given their essential role in our economy, it is odd that some individuals still emphasize, without evidence, immigrants’ criminal records. More than one study has found that “undocumented immigrants are arrested at less than … a quarter the rate of native-born citizens for property crimes.”

Crime rates have been declining. But even if some states and federal agencies select fighting crime as their top priority, what’s the rationale for putting more emphasis on immigrants than on those responsible for most crime?

Moreover, the U.S. power to welcome, or exclude, potential immigrants has limits. The Constitution’s 14th Amendment requirements of “due process” and “equal protection of the laws” apply to “any person,” not just citizens.

For those fleeing persecution, and can prove it, international and U.S. law provide they are entitled to seek “asylum” — requiring the U.S. accept them.

Maybe the issue should be, not who is coming but how many. How many immigrants per year is the right number? As America’s most popular comedian, Nate Bargatze, might say, “Nobody knows.”

Or should our question be, not how many knock on our door, but how many leave home and why. For example, it may cost more to abandon the USAID program than to increase it.

I don’t often dig around in the Hoover Institution’s files, but while John Cochrane’s analysis may not be surprising it is intriguing. With only a half-tongue in cheek he explains why we can handle up to at least one billion more immigrants, and that “quotas” are a “calamitous waste.” “For every objection to open immigration, it’s easy enough to find terms of the deal to resolve the matter. The right terms will allow the optimal amount of immigration to settle itself.”

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” We have work to do.

Nicholas Johnson can be reached at mailbox@nicholasjohnson.org


Sources

The 574 Federally Recognized Indian Tribes in the United States CRS PRODUCT (LIBRARY OF CONGRESS) Hide Overview https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47414

“Famous U.S. Immigrants,” Hudson County Community College, https://library.hccc.edu/c.php?g=366161

“Immigration to the United States,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_the_United_States

“Immigrants in the Low-Wage Workforce,” Work Rise Network, August 25, 2025, https://workrisenetwork.org/feature/immigrants-low-wage-workforce

“Undocumented Immigrant Offending Rate Lower Than U.S.-Born Citizen Rate; Analysis of Texas arrest records indicates a consistent trend across violent, drug, property, and traffic offenses between 2012 and 2018,” September, 12, 2024, chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU01/20250122/117827/HHRG-119-JU01-20250122-SD004.pdf

“From Henry Cabot Lodge in the late 19th century to Donald Trump, anti-immigration politicians have repeatedly tried to link immigrants to crime, but our research confirms that this is a myth and not based on fact,” says Abramitzky, whose 2022 book, Streets of Gold: America’s Untold Story of Immigrant Success, examines the many misconceptions around immigration.” Krysten Crawford, “The mythical tie between immigration and crime,” July 21, 2023, https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/mythical-tie-between-immigration-and-crime

“Crime Trends in U.S. Cities; Year-End 2025 Update,” Council on Criminal Justice,” January 2026, https://counciloncj.org/crime-trends-in-u-s-cities-year-end-2025-update/

‘’Asylum Seeker,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asylum_seeker; “Right of Asylum,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_asylum (“The right of asylum, sometimes called right of political asylum (asylum from Ancient Greek ἄσυλον (ásulon) 'sanctuary'),[1][2] is a juridical concept, under which people persecuted by their own rulers might be protected by another sovereign authority, such as a second country or another entity which in medieval times could offer sanctuary. This right was recognized by the Ancient Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Hebrews, from whom it was adopted into Western tradition.”)

“Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.” “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” Article 14, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights

“Asylum in the United States; Fact Sheet,” American Immigration Council, May 9, 2025, https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/fact-sheet/asylum-united-states/ “Asylum is a protection grantable to foreign nationals already in the United States or arriving at the border who meet the international law definition of a “refugee.” The United Nations’ 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees define a refugee as a person who is unable or unwilling to return to their home country, and cannot obtain protection in that country, due to past persecution or a well-founded fear of being persecuted in the future “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.”

U.S. Constitution, Amendment XIV.

Nate Bargatze, “Washington’s Dream,” Saturday Night Live Opening, October 29, 2023, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqfVE-fykk (“How many liters are there in a gallon, Sir?” “Nobody knows.”)

https://www.hoover.org/research/what-optimal-number-immigrants-us

John H. Cochrane, “Peregrine: What is the Optimal Number of Immigrants to the US? Two billion, two million, fifty-two thousand and thirty-five (2,002,052,035). Seriously. The United States is made up of three and a half million square miles, with 84 people per square mile...,” Hoover Institution, June 24, 2014, https://www.hoover.org/research/what-optimal-number-immigrants-us

# # #