Showing posts with label micro-credit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label micro-credit. Show all posts

Friday, December 25, 2009

Kiva 2009: Don't Give Money, Loan It

December 25, 2009, 6:10 a.m.

The Charitable Gift That Literally Keeps on Giving . . .
and Costs You Nothing

This is the season of giving. This year it's also the season of recession. We've given the Salvation Army bell ringers 7% less than last year, the organization reports. Other charities are suffering similar declines.

We want to do more, but it's not irrational to save more for ourselves at such a time: "charity begins at home" -- our home. That's the dilemma.

Is there any way we could give away our money but still somehow, magically keep it? "Impossible!" you say? It's not impossible. It's Kiva.

Here's a winter holiday blog entry originally published two years ago, slightly updated at the end with new numbers:
_______________

While we're enjoying (or suffering from) the excesses of the holiday season, a good many Americans' thoughts turn to what we should be doing for others.

Add it all up and divide by 300 million Americans and it turns out [that in 2007] we're averaging nearly $1000 in charitable contributions from every woman, man and child. Last year we gave a total of $295 billion, 83% of which came from individuals. We averaged contributions of 2.2% of our disposable income (65% of all households earning under $100,000 a year were contributors). Of that total nearly half went to religious organizations and educational institutions. Add to these numbers the value of the donated time of that half of our population that does volunteer work of some kind each year, and we can feel fairly good about what we're doing for others. Jeffrey Thomas, "Charitable Donations by Americans Reach Record High; Individual giving accounts for 83 percent of $295 billion total in 2006," USINFO.state.gov, June 26, 2007.

And yet, despite our best efforts, there are still over one billion people "living" (if it can be called that) on less than one dollar a day; every day 24,000 children die of hunger; 10 million under the age of five die every year of the diseases resulting from a lack of clean water. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, "A World Mired in Despair of Poverty 'Will Not be a World at Peace,'" October 17, 2003; Jan Eliasson and Susan Blumenthal, "Dying for A Drink of Clean Water," Washington Post, September 20, 2005, p. A23.

Nor are these our only fellow humans in need of economic assistance of some kind.

Clearly, our government should do more of our share to help the rest of the world. But the fact remains that, even with increased government aid and individuals' philanthropy, we can't do this job alone -- especially given the proportion of our government's overseas aid that ends up in the Swiss bank accounts of corrupt local officials and American contractors.

So what to do?

You've heard of Lao Tzu's Chinese proverb, "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." The only trouble with this solution is that the man, or woman, may not be able to afford a fishing pole -- or whatever else they may need to not only feed themselves, but start a modest fishing business.

Enter Kiva.

It has been said that information, a learned skill, or an idea, are examples of a kind of "property" that you can give to another and still retain for yourself.

So it is with the money you give to Kiva. Kiva invests it, but you still have it. It's not a "donation" or "contribution." It's money that's not given, it's loaned (and to a recipient of your choice, not Kiva's) from a Kiva account in your name that you control.

Kiva's network enables you to become a "micro-banker" making "micro-loans" to specific individuals around the world.

And because the repayment rates are so close to 100% -- a much better payback rate than what many of our commercial banks get from their business customers (or you may have received on loans to family members and friends) -- you'll be able to loan that money over and over again.

Have you ever thought twice about giving $25 to a charitable organization, as you wonder how much of your money is going for fund raising expenses, or to well-paid American executives, rather than to supporting the poor or projects the organization represents to be its purpose? Have you ever said to yourself, "What difference will my little contribution make?"

Well, with Kiva every penny of your loan goes to the recipient of your choice. There are no fund raising expenses, no high salaries, no overhead!

(Of course, if you choose to do so you can also contribute to Kiva to support its administrative costs. But the contribution will not come out of the money you've loaned, is certainly not required, and if you do want to contribute it is a separate transaction.)

As the Kiva Web site explains:
Kiva lets you connect with and loan money to unique small businesses in the developing world. By choosing a business on Kiva.org, you can "sponsor a business" and help the world's working poor make great strides towards economic independence. Throughout the course of the loan (usually 6-12 months), you can receive email journal updates from the business you've sponsored. As loans are repaid, you get your loan money back.
This is an approach that ought to appeal to all. Liberals should appreciate the opportunity to help others. Conservatives should support the idea of loans rather than gifts, and giving to businesses rather than making "welfare payments." Libertarians ought to like the idea of keeping the government ("our tax dollars") out of it. (I saw Texas Congressman Ron Paul's picture as a contributor to a Kiva loan recently.)

Want to do something really effective about "the immigration problem" from the south? Loan the little money needed by potential entrepreneurs in Mexico, Central and South America. It will help enable them to continue to live better in their home country, employ others in their community, circulate their profits with purchases in the local economy, and better support and educate their children. [Maria Esthela Sifuentes Hernandez, pictured above in her grocery store, was one of my borrowers in 2008. The loan was for $600, my share was $25, she repaid it in full and on time, and I loaned out the same $25 again -- this time to a woman starting a taxi business in Mongolia. I tend to favor loans to women (80% of Kiva loans go to women) because of the additional positive impact on families and the community.]

The minimum contribution to a loan request is $25 -- and it looks like that's what a lot of contributors choose. But it's amazing how fast, once a loan request is posted on the Kiva site, that 40 individual Kiva contributors, together, can come up with a requested $1000 loan.

There's much more to learn about Kiva than I can reproduce here. But this picture illustrates a couple extra points I'll make quickly. (1) One of the reasons the payback records are so good is the social pressure the recipients provide each other when they apply for loans as a village group. The five women in this picture are "Nassra's Umoja Group," organized by Nassra Said Abdalla in Tanzania. They are making telephone service available through the sale of phone vouchers. Obviously, I find this telecommunications entrepreneurial effort especially attractive, not the least because of the greater-than-average economic multiplier they are providing by enabling business transactions by others' use of phones. (2) It is possible to give Kiva gift certificates to your friends. One of my sons gave me one this year [2009]. And "Nassra's Umoja Group" is one that I gave to my sister; so now she's following the progress of her Tanzania "business partners."

The Kiva Web site reports this morning [Dec. 26, 2007] that this week alone $750,000 has been contributed for loans, 17,000 new lenders have joined Kiva, over 1000 new businesses have been started, 323 entrepreneurs finished paying back their loans, and the average loan, once posted to the Web site, was fully funded within 7.5 hours.

That was two years ago. Today? "Since it’s founding four years ago, [Kiva] has now made possible $100 million in microloans between individual lenders and entrepreneurs all around the world. The company has brought together 573,000 lenders (people like you and me putting in $25 or more towards a specific project), and 239,000 entrepreneurs." Erick Schonfeld, "Four Years After Founding, Kiva Hits $100 Million In Microloans," TechCrunch, November 1, 2009. (For links to Kiva stories in dozens of America's mainstream media, see the organization's "Press Center"; TechCrunch just happened to be at the top of the page just now.)

Because you will (virtually always, but of course not guaranteed or insured) get your loan repaid, but will receive no interest on it, the only "cost" to you of this operation is the "opportunity cost" of what you would have earned on that loan if, instead of loaning it through Kiva, or spending it at Starbucks, you invested it in a CD paying at today's rates about 2% interest. How much is that? On a $25 loan literally 50 cents for the year.

Of course, there are costs of this program -- it's just that they are not costs that you will have to pay. "Kiva" is only a small staff in San Francisco with a global computer network. It works through micro-loan organizations it calls its "field partners" in the countries involved. Those are the organizations that evaluate the potential borrowers, provide them financial and business skills, dispense and collect repayments on the loans. But these field partners' expenses, such as they are, are paid by the recipient of your loan, not you. Yes, your borrower will have to pay interest. But it will be a very small fraction of the prohibitive rates of interest charged by the for-profit individuals or institutions in the recipient's country.

As a lender you can read all about your recipient of choice, the record of the field partner administering your loan, often see pictures of their project, and get regular updates on the progress of their business and repayments. Not only does it not cost you anything, it also makes you much closer to the ultimate recipient than a charitable contribution to a national, state or local organization.

Charitable giving is important, even essential to the continuation of many non-profits in our country. We need to continue to give as generously as our circumstances make possible.

But there is this additional option for you to "be the bank", a "microlender" to the world of worthy potential (and existing) entrepreneurs in third world countries.

Now, while you're thinking about it, check out http://www.kiva.org, and see what I've been talking about.

Make it a Happy New Year -- for you, and for the series of recipients who will benefit from that first Kiva loan of yours, as it's returned to you, and loaned out again and again throughout the years to come.


# # #

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Two TIF Alternatives

August 28, 2007, 4:00 p.m.

Growing Iowa Business the Right Way

A month ago I wrote:

I've had it with the Iowa City City Council and TIFs. I'm going to do my best to see to it that anyone running for council who persists in continuing to take Iowa City taxpayers' money and give it to wealthy, supposedly "free private enterprise" for-profit corporations -- while denying it to their competitors, not to mention needed social programs -- is prevented from serving on the City Council.
Nicholas Johnson, "They're Back: The Terrible TIFs" in "The Terrible TIFs," July 26, 2007 (the entry contains links to prior TIF blog entries and 12 categories of arguments against TIFs).

To which State29 commented:

Nick Johnson . . . says he's going to campaign against every city council candidate there who supports TIFs . . .. Good luck with that uphill battle. Unless Ron Paul is planning to run for political office in Iowa City, I think Nick is going to be rather busy. TIF-supporting candidates (regardless of political affiliation) tend to be "connected" and "experienced", something which voters eat up, even if it takes money out of their own wallets.
State29, "Over in the People's Republic of Iowa City," August 15, 2007.

As is often the case, State29 is right.

The best I've been able to get out of them is that some recognize that Iowa City and Coralville have gone too far with TIFs, or an admission that, yes, some of them have not worked out. But all insist that there are some cases -- perhaps with start-up entrepreneurs -- where they make sense.

So, I hear you say, "We understand what you're against. But does that include any and everything that benefits business -- especially new entrepreneurial start-up businesses? And if not, what are you for?"

This entry is an effort to explain what I'm for: (1) "state-qualified community seed funds" and (2) micro-credit programs.

Community Seed Funds

At the end of "The Terrible TIFs" entry July 26, among my suggestions was: "The business community could create its own venture capital fund to invest in, or loan to, business developments they thought worthy."

Since I know that 90% of my ideas are going to be rejected out of hand (and that many of them deserve to be) I just spin them off and forget them until I'm reminded.

This morning I was reminded.

George C. Ford, "'Seed Fund' Raised to Back Iowa Entrepreneurs," The Gazette, August 28, 2007, p. B8.

It turns out that Iowa has something called community seed funds, and that Corridor banks and private investors have put together a $1.25 million one already.

The approach has many advantages over TIFs.

It's an investment, not a gift -- let alone a gift of the taxpayers' money without their permission.

"An investment committee of seasoned investors" makes the decisions -- rather than a bunch of public officials who have no financial stake in the project and, whatever their strengths may be, are for the most part not "seasoned investors."

Moreover, The Entrepreneurial Development Center President Curt Nelson also says, "We will continue to work closely with these entrepreneurs, monitoring the company and the fund's investment."

I need to find out more about this undertaking, and whether there are some downsides of which I am unaware. But it's always fun for me when it turns out that something that is spurred by my imagination and intuition, and comes out of the depths of my ignorance of a subject, turns out to have been proposed, and put in motion, by folks who really do know what they're talking about.

Micro-Credit Programs

You may know the name Muhammad Yunus. He and his Grameen Bank were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2006.

For what? For what's now called "micro-credit" -- small loans to the poor -- that began with Yunus' 46-cent loans to each of a group of poor craftspersons in Bangladesh in 1976 (for a total of $27).

For the world's truly poor a small loan can make a big difference.

The results were impressive -- both in terms of what the borrowers were able to do with the money and their honorable approach to repaying the loans.

The idea quickly spread. Among other things, this approach removes the opportunity for tempted government officials to take a slice of a multi-billion-dollar loan to their country and send it off to a personal Swiss bank account.

When I served on the board of Volunteers in Technical Assistance some years ago it was one of the categories of projects in which VITA was engaged.

Now, it turns out, you no longer need to own a bank, or be managing funds from USAID, to get into the micro-credit business. You, like Muhammad Yunus, can provide a $25 loan directly to a third world entrepreneur with a face and a name.

You can do it through an organization called Kiva, which you reach at http://kiva.org.

It humanizes and provides a personal story regarding the loan applicants. By joining with Kiva, their third-world "field partners" that administer the program locally (funded by the interest on the loans), and other Kiva members, your $25 (or more) contributions can quickly total the $450 or $1100 requested. As the loans are paid back (and they almost always are in full and on time) your philanthropy becomes a revolving fund that can go on helping more and more entrepreneurs.

There's no reason why micro-credit won't work for entrepreneurs here in Iowa as well as abroad -- even if the "micro" is going to have to be a little bigger.

"Community seed funds" and "micro-credit" are but two of the ways that Iowa can help business grow in the right way.

They draw upon the strengths of the free private enterprise market system -- rather than tax revenues.

Moreover, because an investor, or a creditor, has a personal financial stake in the venture it's more likely the business plan will be well thought through, and reviewed, by people with the incentive -- and skill -- to be of real help in avoiding preventable disasters.

They are more fair to the new venture's competitors -- all of whom have a shot at the funds; all of whom will be judged by the same standards -- than the now-you-see-it-now-you-don't, inexplicable, random allocation of TIF benefits.

They are devoid of the internal ideological inconsistency and hypocrisy of cutting the budgets of legitimate public projects and transferring taxpayers' money directly to a wealthy, for-profit owner's bottom line.

Want to know what I'm for? That's what I'm for. You already know what I'm against.

# # #