tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30130444.post9084833374215898434..comments2024-02-16T09:00:32.845-06:00Comments on FromDC2Iowa: Hasan and the Obligation to InterveneUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30130444.post-23049628767564954512010-03-11T10:30:56.583-06:002010-03-11T10:30:56.583-06:00Advertising Notice
Notice Regarding Advertising: ...<b>Advertising Notice</b><br /><br /><b>Notice Regarding Advertising:</b> This blog runs an open comments section. All comments related to blog entries have (so far) remained posted, regardless of how critical. Although I would prefer that those posting comments identify themselves, anonymous comments are also accepted.<br /><br />The only limitation is that advertising posing as comments will be removed. That is why one or more of the comments posted on this blog entry, containing links to businesses, have been deleted.<br />-- NickNickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08467682953748756539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30130444.post-81277136041261269992009-11-16T12:46:55.341-06:002009-11-16T12:46:55.341-06:00In the United States there is no protection agains...In the United States there is no protection against 'potential harm' unless the person in question:<br /><br />- seeks profession help, that recognizes he is troubled<br /><br />- becomes psychotic enough that he is noted to be a danger to self and/or others based on psychiatric illness<br /><br />- or changes his potential threat to a kinetic threat, that is carries out violence toward others<br /><br />Even in those circumstances a person may roam around the streets, however escaping treatment or arrest (which is often easy to do)<br /><br />No matter what Hasan wrote in emails, discussed in groups, spray painted on walls, there is no one who could have interfered unless: he was performing poorly on the job; he was noted to be psychotic; or crossed the line to engage in criminal behavior.<br /><br />If the potential for violence would be a criminal or a psychiatric issue the jails and MHIs would be filled with disgruntled people muttering about their bosses, their credit card companies, or the opposing political party. Such power would almost immediately used as a political weapon at all levels to segregate dissenters (as in Soviet Russia where political dissenters were committed to bogus psychiatric wards). View "V for Vendetta" as a cinematic version of this.<br /><br />It is not a crime to harbor sadist thoughts toward women -- and might even be encouraged by certain internet sites. Should a person be arrested for thoughts? However once an act of violence is perpetrated, the 'oh no' squad will demand someone's head rolls, while the larger societal devils (stress, unemployment, drug and alcohol use, early abuse, poor education) will simply roll on unabated.<br /><br />Persons will always become alienated, obsessed, psychotic or disgruntled. Some of these persons will perform heinous actions that hurt other people. Their disordered thinking will then be revealed, but only after the fact. The problem is that the weapons of modern killing are far more lethal that the older weapons - knives, fists, bottles. And thus the acts of mayhem will be more violent and more bloody.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com